Mr. Denning Drives North

Mr. Denning Drives North
UK theatrical poster
Directed by Anthony Kimmins
Written by Alec Coppel
Based on Mr. Denning Drives North by Alec Coppel
Produced by Anthony Kimmins
Stephen Mitchell
Starring John Mills
Phyllis Calvert
Herbert Lom
Eileen Moore
Cinematography John Wilcox
Edited by Gerald Turney-Smith
Music by Benjamin Frankel
Production
company
Distributed by British Lion Films
Release date
  • 18 December 1951
Running time
93 minutes
Country United Kingdom
Language English
Box office £70,197 (UK)

Mr. Denning Drives North is a 1951 British mystery film directed by Anthony Kimmins and starring John Mills, Phyllis Calvert and Sam Wanamaker. Alec Coppel wrote the script, adapted from his own 1950 novel of the same title. An aircraft manufacturer accidentally kills his daughter's boyfriend and tries to dispose of the body.

Plot

Wealthy aircraft manufacturer Tom Denning and his wife Kay have a daughter, Liz, who is having an affair with Mados, an international crook. Denning meets with Mados in an attempt to get him away from his daughter, but accidentally kills him with a punch when Mados falls and strikes his head. Instead of calling the police, Denning disposes of the body in a ditch. He tries to disguise the identity of the body by placing a large ornate ring on a finger. A gipsy finds the body and steals the ring. Later, torn with his guilt, Denning goes back to pick up the body only to find that it has disappeared.

Cast

Production

Film rights were bought by Alexander Korda's London Films. John Mills' casting was announced in May 1951. It was Mills' first film in almost two years.

At one stage Dane Clark and Pat Roc were reportedly going to support Mills.

Sam Wanamaker had been living in England since 1949 and was offered the part after writing to his agent from holiday in France asking if any jobs were going.

The film was made at Shepperton Studios.

Instead of credits appearing on screen at the beginning of the film, a narrator announces the film's title, and then reads out the list of actors' names.

Reception

Box office

The film performed poorly at the British box office.

Critical reception

The New York Times wrote: "this little melodrama serves as still another reminder, from a country that jolly well knows how to exercise it, that restraint can work minor wonders [...] Persuasive and tingling, minus one false note [...] No doubt about it. The British have what it takes."

Variety reviewed the film in 1951 calling it "unconvincing and involved" where the direction was "completely inadequate." Two years later the magazine reviewed it more favorably calling it "tense and skillfully developed."

The Washington Post thought the Rolls-Royce "made more sense than any of the alleged human characters [...] a bit pretentious."

Leslie Halliwell said: "Initially suspenseful but finally disappointing melodrama which seems to lack a twist or two."

In British Sound Films: The Studio Years 1928–1959 David Quinlan rated the film as "average", writing: "Film walks tightrope between comedy and suspense with varying success."